Planning Application Details

P96/N0671/OApplication Type: Outline (Show Map - opens in new window)
Status Bar
 
 Completed stage
 
 Current stage
 
 Next stage
Application registered
Consultation period
Application under consideration
Decision made
Description
Erection of dwelling and garage. Access.
Location
Adjoining 'Kings Arms', Forest Hill
Grid Reference
458573/207869
Applicant
J Cooper Development Ltd
4 Cannons Field
Old Marston
OXFORD
OX3 OQR
Agent
John Cooper Development Ltd
4 Cannons Field
Old Marston
OXFORD
OX3 OQR
Constraints
Forest hill Conservation Area
Case Officer
Mrs A.M.Fettiplace
Telephone: 01235 422600
Email: planning@southoxon.gov.uk
Consultation / Notification
No further Representations on this application will be accepted.

Consultations / Notifications to date are shown below.

Name / Number
Date Sent
Response Date
 
c/o Mr Shepherd (Chairman)
84 Hollow Way,
Cowley,
OXFORD,
OX4 2NH
27 11 1996
 
Tech.Dir,Babtie Engineering S.
 
White Oak Cottage
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
White Hart Public House
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
White Hart Cottage
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
Conservation Officer
 
The Former Kings Arms P.H.
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
10 Milton Crescent
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
12 Milton Crescent
Forest Hill
OXFORD
03 12 1996
 
13 Milton Crescent
Forest Hill
OXFORD
OX33 1EJ
02 12 1996
 
14 Milton Crescent
Forest Hill
OXFORD
 
CPRE - Mr N Moon
10 12 1996
 
c/o Mr Merritt
55 Mickle Way
Forest Hill
Oxford
OX33 1DU
11 12 1996
 
Application Type
Minor (Outline)
Application Progress
Date Received  
14th November 1996
Registration Date  
14th November 1996
Start Consultation Period  
14th November 1996
End Consultation Period  
20th December 1996
Target Decision Date  
9th January 1997
Decision
Refusal of Planning Permission on 24th December 1996
Conditions / Refusal Reasons
That the proposal would be contrary to policy EN4 of the Oxfordshire Structure Plan (as proposed to be modified), policy GB1 of the adopted Central Oxfordshire Local Plan and policy GB2 of the approved South Oxfordshire Local Plan (as proposed to be modified). The site lies within the Oxford Green Belt wherein there is a presumption against new development apart from that essentially required for the purposes of agriculture, forestry or recreation. No special circumstances have been put forward that would justify overriding established Green Belt policies. That the proposal would be contrary to the general, environmental and housing policies of the Oxfordshire Structure Plan (particularly policies G1, EN1 and H1 as proposed to be modified), the adopted Central Oxfordshire Local Plan (particularly policies G1, H4, H11 and C5) and the approved South Oxfordshire Local Plan (particularly policies G1, H5, H18 and C3 as proposed to be modified). The site does not constitute a strict infill plot and the proposal would result in an unacceptable form of backland development that would be likely to detract from the amenity and privacy of the occupiers of adjacent residential occupiers. That the proposal would be contrary to policies CON1 and CON7 of the adopted Central Oxfordshire Local Plan and policies CON7 and CON8 of the approved South Oxfordshire Local Plan (as proposed to be modified). It is considered that the erection of a new dwelling in this backland location would neither preserve nor enhance the character of the Forest Hill Conservation Area and would detract from the setting of the former Kings Arms Public House which is a Grade II listed building. That in dismissing an appeal against the decision of the District Council to refuse outline planning permission for inter alia the erection of a dwelling on this site, the Inspector stated that: "Your proposal would result in a dwelling being set some distance behind the street frontage but clearly visible from it. The fact that the site rises away from the road would give the building added prominence. In my view a dwelling here, however well designed, would be seen as being out of character with the conservation area and disruptive to its appearance. I also think that a building in this location would result in a visual rivalry with the listed building which would be detrimental to its setting." It is the Council's view that this statement applies equally to the present proposal.
Appeal
No appeal lodged.
Updates
These Planning Application Details were returned live from our back office database, and as such are as up to date as when the page was retrieved.