Conditions / Refusal Reasons
The development to which this permission relates must be begun not later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.
Reason: By virtue of Sections 91 to 95 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended by section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
That the development hereby approved shall be carried out in accordance with the details shown on the following approved plans, 1, LOC001 and HTS-TPP-01A, except as controlled or modified by conditions of this permission.
Reason: To secure the proper planning of the area in accordance with Development Plan policies.
The exterior of the development hereby permitted shall only be constructed in the materials specified on the plans hereby approved or in materials which shall previously have been approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Reason: In the interests of the visual appearance of the development in accordance with Policy CSQ3 of the South Oxfordshire Core Strategy 2027 and Policies G2, and D1 of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011.
The tree protection details as shown on the approved Arboricultural Method Statement and Tree Protection Plan shall be put in place prior to any on site works including demolition and thereafter retained in situ for the duration of development.
Reason: To safeguard trees which are visually important in accordance with Policies CSEN1 and CSQ3 of the South Oxfordshire Core Strategy 2027 and Policies G2, C9 and D1 of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011
The building hereby permitted shall only be used for the ancillary residential purposes specified within the application submission. It shall not be occupied independently of the dwelling known as Ferry Cottage and it shall not be used for commercial storage purposes.
Reason: The independent residential use of the building would not pass the sequential test set out within the National Planning Policy Framework and as such, its use as a dwelling would be inherently unacceptable in principle. Any other alternative use could represent an undesirable sub-division of the property, resulting in inadequate standards of amenity, highway safety and flood risk, contrary to local and national planning policy.