Planning Application Details

P13/S3377/FULApplication Type: Full Application (Show Map - opens in new window)
Status Bar
 
 Completed stage
 
 Current stage
 
 Next stage
Application registered
Consultation period
Application under consideration
Decision made
Description
Retention of hardstanding to facilitate the agricultural use of the site.
Location
Field off Northern by-pass Mill Lane Elsfield OX3 0QD
Grid Reference
452290/209509
Applicant
Ms M Tysall
9 Millers Mews
WITNEY
OX28 1QT
Agent
MSC Planning Ltd
Beech House
259 Amersham Road
Hazlemere
HIGH WYCOMBE
HP15 7QW
Case Officer
Rob Cramp
Telephone: 01235 422600
Email: planning@southoxon.gov.uk
Consultation / Notification
No further Representations on this application will be accepted.

Consultations / Notifications to date are shown below.

Name / Number
Date Sent
Response Date
 
Elsfield Parish Meeting
c/o Mr James Plunket
Rose Cottage
Elsfield
OXFORD
OX3 9UH
12 11 2013
02 12 2013
 
Hill Farm
Mill Lane
Marston
Oxford
OX3 0QF
11 11 2013
 
Manor View
Mill Lane
Marston
OXFORD
OX3 0QF
11 11 2013
 
Thamesdown
Mill Lane
Marston
OXFORD
OX3 0QD
11 11 2013
 
Hill View
Mill Lane
Marston
OXFORD
OX3 0QD
11 11 2013
 
Mill Brook Farm
Mill Lane
Marston
OXFORD
OX3 0QD
11 11 2013
04 12 2013
 
Hillview Paddock
Mill Lane
Marston
OXFORD
OX3 0QD
11 11 2013
 
Application Type
Minor (Full Application)
Application Progress
Date Received  
29th October 2013
Registration Date  
5th November 2013
Start Consultation Period  
5th November 2013
End Consultation Period  
2nd December 2013
Target Decision Date  
31st December 2013
Decision
Refusal of Planning Permission on 17th December 2013
Conditions / Refusal Reasons
That the development has not been justified on the basis of an agricultural need and is therefore contrary to the overall strategy referred to in policy CSS1 of the South Oxfordshire Core Strategy 2012; and the provisions of policy A1 of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011.

That the site lies within the Oxford Green Belt, where there is a general presumption against inappropriate development in order to conserve the special and historic character of the city and to preserve the countryside outside it. In the circumstances of the present case, the applicant has failed to justify the retention of the hardstanding on the basis of an agricultural need. The retention of the hardstanding to facilitate an outside, non-agricultural use of the land would be contrary to the openness of the Green Belt and would conflict with the fundamental purposes of including land within the Green Belt, namely: to check unrestricted sprawl; and to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment. The hardstanding therefore constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Very special circumstances do not exist that would outweigh the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness or any other harm. The development is therefore contrary to policy GB4 of the South Oxfordshire Local Plan 2011; policy CSEN2 of the South Oxfordshire Core Strategy 2012; and government guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework relating to the protection of the Green Belt.

The applicant has failed to justify the retention of the hardstanding on the basis of an agricultural need. It therefore represents an unnecessary and invasive encroachment of development into a previously unspoiled rural landscape, contrary to policies G2, G4, C4 and D1 of the South Oxforshire Local Plan 2011; policies CSEN1 and CSQ3 of the South Oxfordshire Core Strategy 2012; and government guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework relating to the protection of valued landscapes, local character and distinctiveness.
Appeal
No appeal lodged.
Updates
These Planning Application Details were returned live from our back office database, and as such are as up to date as when the page was retrieved.